Petitions and Resolutions: Prioritizing Human Resources Over Generative AI

And now, for our third reading of the day. Here is a selection of lines taken from the petition for today: “Prioritizing Human Resources Over Generative AI.” While I have pared down this reading quite a bit, I am going to strongly encourage each of you to read the text in its entirety, especially since this is an incredibly important topic for us to have in front of us. Hear these words from this petition:

Whereas we are offered by the Holy Spirit the gifts which are needed for ministry (1 Corinthians 12:1–11).

Whereas we are a connexional church capable of sharing resources, gifts, and skills across our connection to make disciples of Jesus Chris together.

Whereas our Social Principles state that “We are concerned about media monopolies and the tendency of media control to rest in the hands of a few large corporations, and we encourage individuals, communities, and governments to be vigilant in the enforcement of anti-trust policies.”

Whereas the current development of generative AI is concentrated primarily in the hands of a few large corporations and has the potential to affect dramatically our understanding and perceptions of reality, expertise, facts, and evidence, especially when its content is presented as real.

Whereas he Book of Resolutions ¶ 1110 charges The United Methodist Church at every level with the care of creation, including making personal lifestyle changes to reduce emissions, offering support to communities disproportionately impacted by climate change, incorporating climate stewardship and the reduction of fossil fuel use into our work, and advocating for national and international policies aimed at reducing climate change and its impacts on human communities.

Whereas the data centers upon which generative AI relies are expected to surpass the aviation industry in carbon emissions within four years, and their extremely high water use is already damaging local wells, exacerbating water shortages, and raising costs.

Whereas inflation is high and people are increasingly struggling to pay their bills.

Whereas AI data centers can use as much electricity as a small city, and their demand for power is driving up electricity costs for all Americans.

Whereas AI summaries and chatbots are notoriously inaccurate and sycophantic (or, more willing to agree with a user than to offer fact correction or pushback on dangerous ideas).

Whereas AI summaries and chatbots are notoriously easy to trick into providing dangerous information, and willing to suggest dangerous courses of action, such as consistently suggesting nuclear strikes in hypothetical war scenarios.

Whereas the limited contexts in which generative AI may be genuinely useful are not currently able to be separated from the companies which are developing and training the large models that inspire these concerns.

Therefore be it resolved that the United Methodists of Upper New York and their associated congregations, committees, and institutions are encouraged to avoid the use of generative AI in their ministry contexts, preferring in all possible cases to use human-created resources, art, and research instead.

Therefore be it resolved that, where there is an accessibility or equity need that cannot be otherwise met—such as with live translation for Annual Conference meetings—the same persons and bodies are encouraged to take care to avoid using generative AI for anything except the minimum necessary to ensure full participation.

Therefore be it resolved that, in the aforementioned cases, it is encouraged that priority be given to providing for human resources that can replace the AI uses in question—such as live human translators and relevant audio technology—when budgetary increases are considered.

Therefore be it resolved that the same persons and bodies be encouraged to advocate in local and national governments for reasonable legal oversight to generative AI tools and for the requirement of consent before one’s data is processed by or used to train a generative AI model.

This petition was written and submitted by Rev. Rachel Stuart, Senior Pastor at Hurlbut United Methodist Church in Chautauqua, NY.

AI. It’s everywhere. Today, it has become the default, the equivalent of performing a Google search in terms of how much thought and effort it requires. As this petition points out, the development and spread of AI, and its integration into so many aspects of daily life, has taken place at an incredible pace—one that has kept a generous lead ahead of government regulation and ethical scrutiny. When something is so easy to use in daily life—from Facebook and Instagram to internet searches to ChatGPT—it can be easy to ignore the question of whether or not we should be using it. After all, who doesn’t want to have the top results on Google summarized for them? Who doesn’t want their emails sorted into piles of advertisements, newsletters, and actual emails from real people we know? Who doesn’t want to type in a prompt and have generative AI produce a flyer for an event, a video for social media, or anything else that would make life just a little bit easier? It can be tempting, too, to use AI tools to take notes for us in meetings or classes, to offer captioning or translation services to increase accessibility for little or no cost, or to narrate stories or videos so that we don’t have to. Especially when we’re in a hurry and need something done quickly, or when we feel like we don’t have the gifts or knowledge or ability or energy to perform a task that we know AI is capable of performing. And when we have all these constraints and anxieties, it becomes even easier to resist asking: should we use AI?

I am going to sound like a bit of a Luddite throughout this sermon, but I believe it’s important for us to look at AI with the greatest degree of suspicion. This petition lays out many of the reasons to be suspicious of AI, starting with the fact that the generative AI market is dominated by a handful of corporations, each with their own interests in mind. Fewer corporations controlling an industry while contributing millions each election cycle to lobbying efforts ought to make us suspicious. Add to the mix companies like Microsoft and Google, who are well-known for infringing on individual and institutional privacy, and the AI frenzy ought to make all sorts of alarm bells go off in our heads. These companies are also openly working with private security companies, immigration enforcement, and law enforcement at all levels to track individuals and make it next to impossible to maintain any semblance of privacy. ICE uses AI surveillance to target undocumented families, and local law enforcement departments across the US have gone all-in on the latest AI surveillance technology: Flock cameras. When it comes to training the generative AI programs that do things like write emails and produce images, these programs are trained using emails that people have already written and images that others have created—almost always used without the consent of their creators. 

It’s also important to recognize the impact of generative AI on the physical planet we inhabit, and on the lives of other people. As this petition points out, a single data center can consume electricity at a rate comparable to a small city—electricity that is, therefore, not being used in hospitals, schools, homes, churches, and small businesses. The water consumption of these data centers is also nothing new, nor are the rising costs of utilities and the damage that data centers cause to local water infrastructure. Are the convenience and curiosity of generative AI worth lining the pockets of the companies responsible? Are they worth the enormous amounts of energy that it consumes? Can AI help us live into our human vocation? Can it help us build the kin-dom of God, the Beloved Community in which all are valued, loved, fed, and made whole?

In addition to the problematic nature of the AI industry, the use of generative AI carries with it some serious theological problems. The first is that it makes it so much easier for us to ignore the gifts that God has given us for life and ministry, and to ignore the gifts that those around us and invisible to us have. Generative AI would remove a need for those who have the gift of music or visual arts or creative writing or theologizing or philosophizing or learning and interpreting other languages. It allows us to not cultivate these gifts in ourselves, and discourages us from engaging with these gifts in others. Why ask someone else to draw you a picture or write you a prayer, when all you have to do is enter a prompt into ChatGPT? When we encounter problems that our experiences haven’t equipped us for, why would we ask for advice or admit that we don’t have all the answers, when we could just go to Chat and see what it has to say? There is no longer a need to collaborate, engage with professionals, or seek out wisdom from those we recognize as different from us. But there is, because God does not make us to be self-sufficient, but to depend on one another. God does not make us to hubristically create a singular human identity and use that to claim a place above Creation, but to see the gifts each of us has and use them. Each of us has been given gifts by the Spirit, and to neglect those gifts is to neglect what the Spirit has given us.

Second, our dependence on generative AI is a rejection of the human vocation of co-creation. Last Sunday, I talked about the Creation story in Genesis 2, in which God creates people to till the ground. Thus, God invites us to be active in the Creation of the world, and of the kin-dom of God which God has placed in our midst. The Spirit has given us gifts so that we might use them to work together, because none of us has all the gifts needed to fulfill this call on our own. God calls us into community not just because it’s nice for us all to be together, but because we are different. We bring different skills, different experiences, different knowledge. We are the goldsmiths, the perfumers, the carpenters, the priests, the merchants, and the masons described by Nehemiah who share their gifts in rebuilding Jerusalem. Each of us named and storied. When we become dependent on generative AI, when we surrender our ability to collaborate, to think critically, to research, and to seek out our co-laborers, we become like Jonah, who ran from his call to work side-by-side with God. And we all know what happened to that guy. It’s not going to be easy, but Jesus never said it was going to be easy, and Jonah ran because he knew it would be hard. But God goes with us, especially where it is most difficult, and calls us to go together, to do the work of building the Beloved Community in which peace and justice reign.

We are not called to simply do what is easiest, and we certainly aren’t called to simply do what’s best for the bottom line. We are called to engage in the difficult, messy work of co-creation with the divine and one another. We are called to understand, fully, what it means to feel, to be human, to be that which is fearfully and wonderfully made in the image of God. We are called to lean into and embrace the flawed, quirky, queer lives and minds that the Spirit shapes within us, not to seek ways to whitewash our differences. We are not called to assimilate, but to be different and to use our different gifts and gifts of difference with which we have been equipped. God is calling us to build with Them, and with one another. AI cannot generate the City of God. The City is built by human hands, enabled and equipped by God, who calls us together—some to build the foundations, some to build the gates, some to build the towers. We cannot outsource this calling to AI, however tempting that may seem. May we not run from where God is calling us. May we live faithfully into this call to be co-creators. May it be so. Amen.

Next
Next

Petitions and Resolutions: Equip and Resource Local Church Trustees for Carbon-Neutral Planning